Software testing kpi

It is normal to have a high churn when the project begins. It characterizes the period when software engineers explore various potential solutions to a problem. Then the Churn gets lower after the solution is chosen and further refined.

Software failures are almost inevitable, and these metrics help control how well the software recovers from them. These are the key metrics to evaluate the efficiency of maintenance staff. This software development KPI is used to measure the quality of the delivered code. It shows how many defects bugs were detected after the code release. You can capture it per release, sprint, month, week, or another time frame, depending on the project needs. An increasing escaped defects number points to a flawed quality process and can signal that code requirements should be reconsidered before releasing.

This metric measures how many defects were found by the end-user after the product delivery D compared to the bugs found before the delivery E. The closer to 1 DRE, the fewer defects were revealed by the end-users. Often it is calculated in percentage. A Net Promoter Score NPS is used to assess customer satisfaction with the software product after it has gone to the public. NPS is a percentile of customers that refer the product to others. Customer satisfaction is usually evaluated in scores. These KPIs for software development companies assess different quality aspects for both development processes and products, including reliability, performance, security, code quality, and programmer efficiency.

Depending on the project type and your requirements, you may not need to track them all, or you may require other metrics for more accurate analysis. The primary purpose here is to select KPIs to help adjust the development process towards your business goals and achieve the end product's required quality. Any control by itself is useless if it doesn't lead to improvements and doesn't help attain specific goals.

There are multiple key performance indicators for software development that help optimize all processes for product success. The knowledge they provide is an excellent foundation for correct planning and strategic problem-solving at every development stage.

Set meaningful KPIs to control every stage of the software development process. This website uses Cookies for analytical purposes. Read more at Privacy Policy Page. Custom Mobile Development. Application Maintenance. Application Modernization. Quality Assurance. Custom API Development. DevOps Services. SaaS Development. Data Processing. Cross-Platform App. IT Security Services. Cloud Application Development.

Chatbot Development. MVP Development. Real Estate. Event Management. Supply Chain Management. Payment Processing. React JS. Vue JS. Angular JS. Starting from a detailed analysis of the task or attribute understudy might lead to more complex, and more qualitative, metrics, but we believe that it will also lead to more meaningful and therefore more useful data. In my opinion, in this way, you may get very useful data to help and improve the testers. I also agree above suggestions and from this point, I want to share some metrics with you.

Actually, metrics may be endless. You may need to use metrics based on your software development life cycle, development framework, company culture, goals, etc. I will present you with some software testing metrics below.

You can generate many metrics based on the test case numbers. It is a distribution of test tasks in your team. If you are a classical testing guy and writing strict test cases in your project, you can measure them per tester. You can get how many test case writing tasks do you have for each project in a given period of time. This metric shows defects found in production.

It shows your development, system, network, etc. You have to make a Pareto analysis to find and prioritize your major problems. I think this is a very low-level metric. It may be hard to measure too. We should focus on delivering valuable, defect-prone, high-quality, fast, secure, usable products. This is the ratio between development effort and the defects in a given time period such as sprint, week, month, etc.

Example : 5 programmers have 5 days of software development activity. A total of defects were found. It is the report that shows how many defects have been found in each module of our product in a given time period. The sprint goal and must be approved by the PO at the end of each sprint.

All successful sprint statistics are collected and the percentage of successful sprints is calculated. Some agile teams use this metric as KPI but most of the agile enthusiasts are against this behavior. It is a metric based on passed, failed rates of all tests run in a project according to the determined period. Please do not use this metric to assess an individual. Focus on problems and try to solve them. It has to lead you to ask questions.

If you use this metric as a KPI, it may cause problems between testers and developers in the software development life cycle and may damage the behavior of being transparent.

Be careful about this metric. Written test cases will be evaluated and scored according to the defined criteria. If it is not possible to examine all the test cases, the test cases will be evaluated by sampling. Our goal should be to produce quality test case scenarios by paying attention to the defined criteria in all the tests we have written.

You may use this metric as KPI. It is expected that faults found during UAT will be lower than the number of valid faults found during the testing and development processes. Some team uses this metric as a KPI for their testers and developers. Note : This measurement is calculated one step further by multiplying each defect with its priorities and severities.

With this method, defect scores are obtained by their priorities and severities. It shows how successfully the defects are caught before moving to the staging environment. With this Metric, we will measure our achievement of defect detection and removal efficiency prior to staging environment testing.

Some teams are using this metric as a KPI. It is a KPI that shows how many of the defects that are resolved are reopened. Each reopen defect will have to be retested and this metric will show the efficiency rate that we lost in retesting the resolved defects.

It is a metric that measures the status of faulty defects that a test engineer has opened. This metric will be able to use to measure defect efficiency. Too many rejections of defects indicate inefficiency and time loss in the development life cycle.

Some organizations use this metric as KPI for their test teams. I did not take into consideration UAT defects. If you want, you can also add UAT defects in this measurement. But this time, you should not use this metric as a tester KPI. It is the density of the defects from the running test scenario. If we use this metric in this way, we will create serious conflicts between development and testing teams. It would be more logical not to consider this metric as KPI for development and test teams.

This metric can be varying with the size of development work, experiences of developers and testers, time pressure, lack of documentation, poor SDLC process, and so on.

Too many variables connected to this metric. It is better not to use this as a KPI. Understand the process 2. Review the KPIs that can be measured 3. Figure out the KPIs that should be measured for maximum effectiveness according to your project. There is no hard and fast rule to measure all these KPIs and you can also come up with KPIs that are not mentioned in the list. The most common KPIs that are measured in the software testing industry:.

For an organization looking to measure testing KPIs, it is essential to understand the existing testing process and then measuring the KPIs that will bring out the actual improvements needed. It is important to know what value addition you are looking for, because these KPIs, if not used properly, could easily lead you in the wrong direction.

This time will be crucial to put a testing process in place rather than measuring the effectiveness of the testing process. You are on a restricted budget Just like doing any activity, measuring testing KPIs also takes time and effort and consequently cost. So rather than measuring the KPIs, applying a cost-effective testing process should be the main focus when the budget for testing is restricted.

If you have an organization that has been planning to move to test automation but has been worried about the learning curve and the humongous amount of time needed for implementation of automation, look out for tools that enable to you to automate test cases in as much time as creating them manually will take. Testsigma is one such tool that is quickly getting recognized for the ease of use and the negligible learning curve!

Create self-healing automated tests for web and mobile apps, and APIs, in simple English, with Testsigma. Subscribe to get all our latest blogs, updates delivered directly to your inbox. Manual Testing Test Automation. September 3, What are the KPIs? The most common KPIs that are measured in the software testing industry: Active Defects All the defects that are not closed yet are called Active Defects.

It could have defects that are new, that are open or that are fixed but not verified. The testing manager needs to decide on a threshold value beyond which immediate action will have to be taken about how to proceed to lower the number of active defects.

The general rule is, the lower the number of active defects, the better is the quality of the product at a point in time. Authored Tests This KPI is used to measure the number of test cases being designed during a defined interval of time.